Cooling is key

November 6, 2008 – 11:37 am

As noted in the MOTD last night, we had a brief cooling failure in our Santa Rosa datacenter. This turned out fine. We had staff on site, and we have learned some things that will prevent this particular failure in the future.

For those interested in the technical reason for the failure, during the multiple power transitions from utility to generator and back, the variable frequency drives (VFDs) on the four redundant air handlers sensed an over-voltage condition and shut down to protect themselves. To address this, they have now been re-configured; if they have a failure now, they will wait eighty seconds for power to stabilize and re-start automatically.

The interesting thing though was that this presented an opportunity to see what really happens in a large datacenter without AC for a brief period of time. Total cooling downtime was 15 30 minutes, and during that time, the temperature rose 15 degrees. The room is typically kept at 69 degrees fahrenheit, so this pushed the ambient room temperature to about 85.

Meanwhile, in-cabinet temperatures for cabinets with a lot of equipment in them nearly touched 100 degrees F. That’s just ten to twenty degrees prior to when we expect equipment to begin failing, so this was a close call for us.

Datacenters are challenging environments to design. You need fully physically redundant Internet connections, plus fire suppression, physical and electronic security, power backup and redundant cooling. We’re very pleased with the efficiency of our new AC system and it’s VFDs, and it’s clear how critical it is from this incident.

  • http://dannyman.toldme.com/ Daniel Howard

    Given concerns over carbon emissions, has there been much thought to allowing data centers to run at a higher temperature? It is one thing to set the office thermostat a few degrees higher and see if people get uncomfortable, but optimizing the thermostat level for machines could be done with even more reasonable precision.

    Just a though.

    Sincerely,
    -daniel

  • http://www.e-myth.com Edgar

    I am glad to see everything went well, Good job to all. I bet our cab was one of the ones running toasty.
    Ed

  • Pingback: Steaming hot | Sonic.net CEO Blog

  • http://www.core4sys.com Rick Cockrell

    “Given concerns over carbon emissions, has there been much thought to allowing data centers to run at a higher temperature? It is one thing to set the office thermostat a few degrees higher and see if people get uncomfortable, but optimizing the thermostat level for machines could be done with even more reasonable precision.” Daniel

    Daniel, There is a common miss conception in data centers today. The thought that turning up the temperature saves money. Turning the temperature up can actually cost a facility more energy. Data Centers produce heat and a BTU is a BTU (measruement of heat) no mater what temperature it is, it still takes energy to remove that heat. Ganted LBNL (Lawerence Berkley National Labs) says, this is what a facility should do, they are wrong. Turning up the temperature only causes your existing cooling to remove more moisture (Based on the design of a CRAC), then your humidifiers spend more time operating. Sonics Cooling System operates at 57°F Supply Air Temp / 68-70° Return Temp and 45-50% RH. This is a perfect enviroment for processors and servers. Their system also operates at a server to cooling ratio of as high as 9.5 to 1 and average 6.87 to 1, which is twice as efficient as LBNL state of the art figures. Higher temperatures will only lower the life expectance of the servers…It does just save energy!