Why include phone?

September 9, 2010 – 1:18 am

Recent news (SFGate) on landline phone service isn’t what most in the telecommunications industry would call good; nearly 30% of households no longer have landline home phone service. This is up from around 25% of homes that had cut the cord a year ago. Disconnections are accelerating, with 1% of consumers dropping their landline home phone service each quarter.

In addition, the National Center for Health Statistics, a division of the US Centers for Disease Control reports that roughly 15% of those who do have home phone service make little or no use of it! (The NCHS/CDC tracks these stats so they can better understand telephone polling results for public health studies.)

So against this clear trend, why does our newest product, Fusion, include landline phone service?

There are a number of reasons, and I hope the sum of them is enough to make the case.

In designing Fusion, we hope to reset your expectations about both broadband and voice telephone service.

At the core, Americans are fed up with overinflated, complex phone bills. I don’t think customers want to drop home phone service, but everyone clearly wants to stop spending money on overpriced phone service that they make very little use of. In our customer surveys, we have found typical home phone bills in the $25 to $55 range. These bills are ridiculous, and not well justified by actual costs.

Costs are the key to the Fusion equation. Sonic.net uses copper “phone” lines to connect your home or business to our equipment in the central office for Fusion broadband. These lines themselves have the same cost whether they carry data only, or voice and data. This makes the incremental cost of delivering landline voice alongside the broadband data very low.

Second, we don’t use home phones the same way we used to. Most of us take the majority of our incoming calls on our mobile phones. (Note that CDC statistic above!) This makes landline phone service a prime target to terminate, particularly if it’s expensive.

But at the same time, this reduction in minutes of voice calling usage means a reduction in the usage related costs for carriers like us. The fact is that people use landline voice less than ever before, while per-minute usage costs are dropping for carriers. These complimentary trends allow for aggressive new thinking about what voice “should cost”.

These trends let us deliver voice with a difference; Fusion simply includes voice with unlimited nationwide calling for residential users, and for businesses, a simple $0.01 a minute for calls made nationwide.

At the right price, landline phone service is a convenient and useful tool. Landlines don’t drop calls like mobile phones often do, and the voice quality is better so you can really understand the person you are talking to. Landline service is also useful for fire and burglar alarm systems, medical alert systems, gates and call boxes and more. But I wouldn’t pay $35 for landline voice. Heck, I wouldn’t pay $15 for it, and nor should you!

Having a reliable landline at home also offers peace of mind. Reliable 911 service which provides physical address information to emergency responders is a key lifeline, and it’s awful that so many households do without because it has been overpriced. And because landline voice service is DC (direct current) powered from the central office, it works even when your household power is out.

If what I was trying to sell was the same old $25+ landline, I wouldn’t bother, it just doesn’t make any sense anymore. But fast and inexpensive Fusion Broadband+Phone delivers the fastest broadband plus included landline phone. I hope Fusion will help reverse the disconnection trend.

  • Jeremy

    Dane, I just activated my Sonic fusion service with landline support and I have one serious problem: I can no longer look up residential numbers with 411; it’s just not supported. Disappointing!

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Jeremy,

    Our 411 service was intended from the outset to be free, rather than a fee of $1 or so that most other carriers charge. We partner with Google 411 for this service, and it includes call connect, which is often yet another fee from most carriers.

    But, as you point out, because we are not collecting $1 for every lookup, we cannot provide residential lookup. We have seen a shift to unlisted numbers in most cases, and this seemed like the best compromise in order to avoid fees.

  • Simon Waddington

    The moment you can port my old number to Fusion I’m in… any news on the ETA for number porting? I seem to have detected an increased number of special offer mailings and calls from AT&T trying to sell me their overpriced packages I got my Fusion data line – perhaps they are targeting your customers?

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Simon,

    We have done ports of existing numbers to existing Fusion for two beta customers, and we found some problems in our order flow. We are fixing it and then will push to more customers.

    -Dane

  • Doug VanLeuven

    OK, I’m sold on the concept and I want the service.
    Seems I’m in the area but the type of connection my land line has at the junction box precludes me getting the service.
    Do you have any plans to upgrade your equipment to allow for additional input types and I just have to wait, or could I ask AT&T to change my physical hookup so it is compatible with your equipment? I’m willing to expend energy over this but I’d need to know the exact technical terminology to communicate with AT&T.
    I called in, but am hearing impaired and couldn’t quite make out what was being said (really frustrating for me); sort of like I have a XX hookup and your equipment needs YY. I didn’t consider the implications until later.

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Doug, that’s a new one I haven’t heard. Generally you are either located in the area we serve, or not. I will send you an email for more details.

    -Dane

  • Lynn Goodison

    I keep a land line because I have children. You just do not want to use a cell phone to field all of your kids calls. Also in emergencies land lines work better than cell phones.

  • Richard Mlynarik

    The sales web page http://www.sonic.net/solutions/home/internet/fusion/ still says “Switching from your current carrier is easy, and you can keep your current telephone number” even though that can’t yet be done.

    It’s quite frustrating how much time one has to waste on the phone to sales trying to get accurate information that SHOULD be trivial to provide (and cheaper for Sonic to provide) on the web site.

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Richard,

    To clarify, new customers signing up today do port and retain their current number.

    For existing customers on the Fusion platform, we can activate a new number now, and we’ve got a few customers in beta test on porting. We completed two last week, and I believe they’re putting in one or two more now – you can request being added to that group IF you’re comfortable with it being a process still in testing.

    -Dane

  • Allen

    This sounds like a great offering. Does Sonic take care of canceling my AT&T landline and DSL services or is that something I have to coordinate after ordering the Fusion bundle online, and do I have to be home for installation? Just wondering how seamless this is and what I may need to do on my end to make sure transition costs are held to a minimum.

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Allen,

    It’s pretty easy. Your current wiring remains in place, and is just moved to our equipment in the central office. Your current carrier receives notice of loss of the line and phone number.

    If you have an alternate long distance provider, you may need to inform them afterwards.

    Sign up now, it’s easy!

    -Dane

  • Ron

    When is Fusion coming to Los Angeles?

  • Hank Roberts

    When AC power fails, plan old phone lines often continue to work (as they did for many of us after the Loma Prieta earthquake for example).

    Assuming ATnT’s system has a dial tone,
    will a Fusion landline be just the same?

    (My then office had their voicemail on UPS, so before evacuating the building, we left “out of the office” messages — my home answering machine is UPS too, for that eventuality.)

    (I know not to pick up the phone immediately in a disaster.)

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Ron,

    Yes, Fusion voice is currently exclusively line powered land line service. Works fine without local power.

    -Dane

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Ron,

    We are not currently building in LA.

    -Dane

  • Fawn

    I just switched my landline over to Fusion this morning. I use this number for my home office, and since you don’t have voice mail on the Fusion service yet, I’m taking this as a convenient opportunity to start using my Google Voice number as my work number.

    The only problem is that since the switch, I’m not receiving calls forwarded from my GV number to my landline. The landline simply doesn’t ring.

    I’ve already called tech support and they’ve taken the question to whichever internal group handles these kinds of questions, so I’m sure I’ll have an answer soon. I’m more curious than anything — I see on the Google Voice forums that other people have been having this problem, so I’m not sure the problem isn’t at Google’s end, even though it coincided with my switch to Fusion.

    (I also realize this is a minor problem — I can, of course, place calls directly, and I can still use GV for my voice mail, at least until you get your own voice mail running.)

  • Bill

    Dane;

    In another blog post asking about Palo Alto PLALCA12 you responded (June 20)

    “Phil,

    Sorry for the confusion – we’re adding COs so rapidly that it’s likely a staff member was unaware that Palo Alto was live. Order up now, or you can wait for the new flat rate (with voice) service.

    -Dane”

    I am very close to that CO and currently on DSL with Cyberonic (COVAD), have an ATT phone with that CO, but when I’ve tried to sign up for FUSION I’m told it’s not available. Is this CO live for FUSION? If not, soon please!

    Thanks

    Bill

  • John Bacon

    Dane,

    We are moving from Sunnyvale to Santa Clara. I was delighted to discover that Fusion was available at our new address. I presented the following comparison of Fusion to AT&T to my wife.

    Advantages
    - $16/mon less first year. $36/mon less later years
    - International calls half the to cost
    - Potentially significantly faster Internet
    - More reliable Internet Service
    - Much better Internet support
    - It’s Not the Phone Company or the cable company

    Disadvantages
    - No Call Waiting Caller ID
    - No Call Forwarding though under development.
    - Free access to AT&T’s US airport wireless
    - In a major local earthquake calling local emergency services is less likely to work
    - Phone service may be less reliable, though I have found no complaints. Phone service is only about 3 months old. Having cellphones this matters less than historically.
    - It’s Not the Phone Company

    My wife insists that we go with AT&T because of the lack of Call Waiting Caller ID and my concerns about emergency services in an earthquake.

    Do you have plans to implement Call Waiting Caller ID? We find it much more useful than just Call Waiting.

    My earthquake reliability guess is this. An emergency call with AT&T directly goes to the CO where it is directly switched to the local emergency service. (This may not be true for 911 calls but only for calls to the main police and fire numbers). With Fusion the call is placed on Sonic’s fiber loop at the CO, routed to your datacenter in Santa Rosa, and then routed back somehow to the Santa Clara CO. The Sonic path seems to me to have many more points of potential failure. I would appreciate your comments on this.

    Thanks,
    John

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    John,

    Call waiting caller ID is supported. Have we missed including that on a feature list somewhere? Let me know, wondering where you saw that it was not.

    Our service is landline voice, with full enhanced 911 support. You should expect a similar level of reliability with out landline service as you do with ATT.

    One clarification: forwarding is not under development. We currently do not have plans to offer call forwarding with Fusion residential voice. (We may at business sites, where usage is metered.)

    Voicemail service is in open beta today, and support can activate it on any Fusion line.

    -Dane

  • Jon Witort

    Hey Dane,

    Regarding “new customers signing up today do port and retain their current number”, our number is currently served by Vonage (over Sonic.net Fusion Broadband, ‘natch), having been ported a couple years ago from AT&T (with Sonic.net DSL, ‘natch), and tech support told me that only numbers that are *currently* AT&T numbers may be ported to Fusion POTS. The only workaround suggested was to port the number back to AT&T for a minute, at which point you guys could grab it. Why can AT&T process the port, but not Sonic.net? Trying to figure out a way to get Sonic POTS with my current number.

    thanks!
    jon

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Jon,

    So you’ve got both an AT&T POTS line (with your Sonic.net DSL on it), and a Vonage line?

    We’re not yet ready to port numbers from other carriers, but we will be soon.

    -Dane

  • Neil

    Sonic’s Fusion product looks like a solution to my needs, but when I contacted customer support the other day, I was told that it wasn’t available because my line was serviced behind an AT&T remote terminal instead of being fed directly from the RDCYCA01 C.O. This arrangement works quite decently for the voice and DSL service on my existing POTS line, though the combination is speed-limited and a bit more expensive than I think it needs to be.

    I hope you folks are working on a solution for this limitation in providing what might otherwise be an excellent alternative to what I (and undoubtedly many other potential customers currently have.

    …Neil

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Neil,

    We don’t have anything tangible to offer you today, but we are working on a few ideas.

    -Dane

  • John Bacon

    Dane,

    Thank you for the information the Call Waiting Caller Id (CWCI) is supported. This may enable me to persuade my wife to go with Fusion.

    CWCI is not listed on the Fusion sales pages. I can’t find a Fusion FAQ or other support pages.

    I had two long conversations with Sonic support before writing my summary on Fusion vs. AT&T. They told me the CWCI was not available and not under development. They also told me Call Forwarding was under development. They did tell me about the Beta of Voicemail.

    The information about emergency calls was based on questions on voice routing.

    We still use our land line as our primary telephone because of clarity, convenience, and limiting calls while away from home. We Call Forward to our cellphone when we expect an urgent call on the land line.

    I understand your usage concerns, but Call Forwarding is a very useful feature for those of us who still consider our landline our primary phone.

    John

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    John,

    Sorry for any confusion. We’ll get updates pushed to the sales site with details on caller ID. I’d thought that “caller ID” covered it, but we should make it clear that it also works with call waiting.

    Regarding forwarding, it’s a business decision based upon costs. As the Fusion voice product matures, we will continue to evaluate this.

    -Dane

  • John Bacon

    Dane,

    We are moving from Sunnyvale 408-736-nnnn to Santa Clara. AT&T says that our Sunnyvale number can’t be ported to Santa Clara and we have to get a 408-249-nnnn or 408-423-nnnn number.

    Sonic support said if AT&T can’t port our old number, then Sonic Fusion can’t either.

    Are we stuck with getting a new number?

    John

  • Jon Witort

    Hey Dane,

    No, I have Fusion Broadband supporting one Vonage line, no POTS. Here’s how I’ve evolved as you all have evolved:

    Long time ago: AT&T POTS, Sonic DSL
    Now: Fusion Broadband (pair bonded), Vonage, no POTS
    Future?: Fusion Broadband + POTSx2, no Vonage

    My phone number was ported from AT&T to Vonage when I made that jump, and now I’d like to bring that same number to Sonic POTS. I hoped that since the number was originally an AT&T number, that it might make that more possible.

    cheers,
    jon

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Jon,

    I think we can port an existing Vonage number over to an existing Fusion line, but it’s a new process and it’s likely to take a bit of time. Send me an email and I’ll put you together with someone who can assist with getting this rolling.

    -Dane

  • glenn roncal

    I am in the same digital boat.

    Can not wait until you can port my vonage number to your service.

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Support can now initiate a port of a number from any carrier over to an existing Fusion line. We cannot both establish new service and port at the same time due to different intervals, so if you do not have Fusion yet, just order, then request the port when it is established.

    -Dane

  • Graham Freeman

    re Fusion: It rocks. I love it.

    re call forwarding:

    Ugh, please change your thinking on this. :P

    I understand the business rationale behind not wanting to enable people to potentially abuse your “unlimited” pricing, but you’ve already covered abuse in your TOS, haven’t you? Sure, there are still increased costs with forwarding that fall short of abuse, but IMO if you’re competing with “cord-cutting” then you need to do what you can to facilitate simplicity in telecommunications.

    By enabling modestly complex features such as delayed-call-forward / busy-call-forward (and of course immediate-call-forward), you can enable your geographically mobile customers (of whom I would expect there are many) to maintain just one phone number. It seems to me that this would be helpful in bringing folks back from cell-phone-only ways of living.

    In the past, you’ve recommended Google Voice for folks who want one number for personal contact, but for me there are two show-stoppers with this: (1) I don’t trust Google with anything I consider private, and (2) as a practical matter, Google Voice doesn’t support porting numbers in, which means my wife and I have to stick with a VOIP provider for the number she’s had since grad school.

    Please, at least provide delayed-call-forwarding and busy-call-forwarding for those of us who prefer to stick with an existing voicemail solution.

    thanks,

    Graham

  • Herb

    I am in your service area. Problem I have now with AT&T is I am at the minimum Downstream and Upstream speeds average around 700 kbps Download Speed and 320 kbps Upload Speed. AT&T has played around and when they set it at higher speeds my connection is unstable. I was told due to my location this is the best they can do.

    Would going with Fusion, can I at least get downstream fast enough to stream movies from Netflix? Is there a minimum guarantee Downstream and Upstream speeds?

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Herb,

    It sounds like you’re on a long or poor quality loop, and unfortunately Fusion doesn’t fix that itself.

    The one capability Fusion has that could be of help to you is the ability to bond two lines, for double the speed. You could switch to Fusion and let us see how it does, then add a second line for ~2x the speed if it seems like that will get you what you need.

    -Dane

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Graham,

    Regarding your request that we add call forwarding to Fusion:

    We are rather conservative here when it comes to the economic modeling around our products (no debt; no loans, no leases, lots of care) which is the reason for omitting the call forwarding feature.

    It has a cost, which could be nominal or it could be large, depending upon where the line is forwarded and how much usage it gets. This might turn out to not be too bad at all.

    We can always add features to the Fusion service, but we really cannot remove them, so we’ve held this one back – and we may choose to add it in future, as things become clearer around all the costs in the existing business model.

    -Dane

  • Daniel

    Dane,
    could you please give me a real answer for why you don’t have California life line. The answers that I’ve got from customer service just don’t fly. With fusion and voice I have to pay all of the costs for lifeline and more if you excepted lifeline there are a lot of costs in the list of things that you call taxes and fees that I would not have to pay.

    Cheers
    Daniel

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Daniel,

    The basic issue is that Fusion is a bundle, with Internet and unlited nationwide calling, and lifeline cannot be applied to any service except basic voice.

    There are discussions at the FCC about expanding lifeline to Internet access, but that hasn’t happened yet.

    -Dane

  • http://? Ernest Montague

    I am an earthlink subscriber in Oakland. Do you currently cover the 94602/ Laurel area?

    Thanks much.

    Ernie

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Ernest,

    You can check availability of Fusion from the web site, at http://sonic.net/fusion/. Currently all Oakland COs are online except for Piedmont, which is still under construction.

    -Dane

  • http://blog.rchen.net Richard Chen

    Recently went live on Fusion and promptly ditched AT&T landline. Insanely happy with the service so far.

    I did notice that for inbound calls, the Caller ID displays just the incoming TEL# without the caller’s subscriber name of record; seeing the name of the caller was very handy for screening telemarketers.

    Any plans to enable CNID support in the future?

    Keep up the great work,

    Rich

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Richard,

    Caller ID Name (CNAM) is offered when it’s available to us, so you’ll see it on some incoming calls and not others. Delivering it consistently is not something we assure in the Fusion platform. Database lookups to fill in the missing ones are simply not built into the cost of the product.

    There are a few area where Fusion is designed for cost efficiency, in order to deliver the maximum capabilities at the best possible cost. For example, we streamline by only offering a single product and configuration; uncapped full speed, with phone. This makes product design and marketing straightforward. We require automated payment, which allows for simplified automated billing.

    Uniform availability of CNAM is one casualty of this drive to reduce costs and deliver a product with unprecedented value.

    -Dane

  • O.

    Hi Dane,

    Your explanations fail to convince me.
    I already have VoIP, complete with free calling abroad and E911. Regardless of how cheap you can make it, I do not need nor want yet another phone number and all the taxes it implies
    http://sonic.net/solutions/home/internet/fusion/taxes_fees/.

    Overall I like what Sonic is doing, but I really wish you also (again) offered data-only Fusion.
    Any chance of this happening?

    Thank you
    Have a great week-end

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    O.,

    Fusion is a single simple product, “one size fits many.” The simplicity is what drives down costs, and for many it is a great value. Perhaps cancel your VoIP?

    -Dane

  • Jon Witort

    Hi Dane,

    I signed up for 2 lines (love it), and at that time the tech suggested that I could have Sonic disconnect the second phone line if I didn’t need it (I do) to save on the taxes imposed by city, county, state, country (whew!). If that’s true, maybe it would suit O.?

    jon

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    Jon,

    That was before the price drop and product unification. Now we offer just the one config, broadband + phone.

    -Dane

  • O.

    Thanks Jon for the idea. Really too bad ‘Standalone’ isn’t sold anymore.

    Hello Dane,

    Thank you very much for your prompt answers. I’m not sure I’m totally following you though.

    You mention that Fusion is “a single simple product”. Sonic nonetheless offers a choice of dynamic or static IP (and business vs residential). By your logic (line costs the same + keep it simple) static IP should just be included shouldn’t it?
    You recently mocked BT charging for Annex M (http://corp.sonic.net/ceo/2010/08/24/bt-you-are-doing-it-wrong/), and rightly so IMHO. Now, isn’t $20/mo for the mere privilege of a static address just as ludicrous?

    Back on topic: you also say that nobody should pay $15/mo for voice. Agreed. Yet how much does ‘voice’ add to Fusion? A couple $ for DIDs and domestic calls… plus $9 to $14 in regulatory fees. Are you effectively telling us that Sonic own voice service is overpriced then?

    Sorry, while Sonic’s ADSL2 pricing looks competitive, Fusion can’t be “great value” in my eyes if each line comes forcibly bundled with ~$15/mo of cruft I don’t need nor want.

    I currently have DSL-only lines from Speakeasy. They have no phone number, no dialtone, just data. Love it, except I’d like to move all this to ADSL2 and what Speakeasy charges for that is completely nuts.

    If it wasn’t for this POTS requirement, I’d switch to Sonic in a heartbeat. Note that I don’t suggest you offer “line sharing” (eg: AT&T POTS + Sonic ADSL), merely a no-POTS, data-only option over an otherwise unused pair. Even at the same price, I’d take it.

    I sincerly hope that Sonic eventually revises its position on this question.

    [BTW Dane, the VoIP service you suggest I give up costs me ~$6/mo incl all taxes, with E911, free calls+forwarding in >40 countries, voicemail-email integration, multiple DIDs with simultaneous inbound/outbound calls etc etc.
    It's SIP so it supports HD audio (G722), video, works over WiFi and 3G... But the main thing: I have half a zillion providers to choose from, e.g: http://progx.ch/home-voip-prixbetamax-3-1-2.html
    And you hope to compete with... POTS?!? In 2011?]

  • http://www.sonic.net/ Dane Jasper

    O.

    How does your price point for the DSL-only (standalone, aka “dry”) service from your other provider compare to our offering, when voice taxes & fees are included? (You can obtain an estimate of specific taxes and fees for your city here: http://sonic.net/solutions/home/internet/fusion/taxes_fees/#example ) When you say “even at the same price, I’d take it”, do you mean the price you’re paying your other provider, or the price we charge inclusive of regulatory taxes and fees?

    Regarding static IP pricing, I’m confident that you’ll see continued decreases in the cost of statics in the future. That is something we’ve planned for the product road map.

    -Dane

  • O.

    Hi Dane,

    Thanks again for your reply, very much appreciated.

    I’m currently paying 50.32$/mo incl all taxes: 45.95 for DSL (multi-line/loyalty discount; 8 static IPs) plus 4.37$ of “regulatory compliance fees”.
    No POTS = zero phone bill. VoIP as described above only adds ~$6/mo all included (E911, international etc).

    Sonic’s legacy DSL requires AT&T phone service (~14$/mo with fees) so in the end even 768kb/s service ends up being more expensive.

    Fusion in its current form would cost me 39.95$ + 20$ for static IPs + 9.18 regulatory = 69.13$/mo, ie 37% more.
    I’m almost 3km from the CO so I probably won’t gain a lot from ADSL2, at least not enough to justify both this much extra $$ and switching ISP.

    Dropping phone service would cut most or all of the regulatory fees; hopefully it would also allow you to lower the service price (-> 35$?) but I’ll even consider a dry-loop/no-POTS Fusion at 40$/mo.
    Now, couple this with more affordable static IPs? Sign me up!

    I’ll definitely keep an eye on what your company is offering.

  • Jeremy

    Regarding taxes, regulatory and such:

    While I am waiting for my Fusion to be activated, I have this to say.

    I’m very happy with the $39.95/m price for DSL.

    I don’t use a phone, I don’t even mind paying for a phone, but the phone adds so much regulatory and taxes that I would rather not have the phone line just so I don’t have those extra taxes.

    I know your decision on a single product is made. However, Maybe a toggle in the members area for phone or no phone. Charge me the same $39.95 either way. But, say if I toggle phone off, then at least all the extra phone related taxes to me do not kick in.

    Thank you.

  • Anonymous

    I have hesitated dropping my “Bell” POTS line because it seems to be the most resilient communications system in an emergency (earthquake) mostly because of the robust, redundant power supplies. Is the Fusion phone line equally likely to work when, for instance, the electricity goes out?
    Thanks
    Tom

  • Anonymous

    How else does the user experience of 2-line fusion POTS differ from a telco product?
    Thanks

  • Anonymous

    Yes, the voice product is traditional style line powered voice, so it will work during a local power outage. Land line POTS (plain old telephone service) is an important safety net in a widespread emergency such as an earthquake.

    -Dane

  • Anonymous

    It shouldn’t in any meaningful way – the main limitations are around product design and features. They’re all included, making it a very simple product at a single fair price.

    One update on CNAM (caller ID w/name), we are working to add 100% CNAM lookups to the product, and if things go well we hope to be able to deliver that in the coming months.

    -Dane

  • Martin

    I understand that 39.95 simplifies billing, but how is this simple?  From your FAQ: “The overall product philosophy is to embed all features in a single product. This decreases complexity in billing, marketing and implementation, allowing for the lowest cost possible.”
    Federal Subscriber Line Charge Fee$6.50Federal Universal Service Fund Fee$2.38FCC Interstate Telecom Service Provider Fee$0.05FCC Telecommunications Relay Service Fund$0.14California Lifeline Telephone Service Surcharge$0.15California Deaf and Disabled Telecom Program Surcharge$0.03California High Cost Fund-A Surcharge$0.00California High Cost Fund-B Surcharge$0.04California Teleconnect Fund Surcharge$0.01California Advanced Services Fund Surcharge$0.02California 911 Emergency Surcharge$0.06California Public Utility Commission User Fee$0.02San Francisco Utility Users Tax$0.00San Francisco Access Line Fee$2.86

    My $48 u-bill simple because it’s exactly $48… always.  I was hoping to save money but adding $12.26 in taxes each month would make the Sonic bill more complex and more expensive.  How is this simple???  I’m sure sending out $.01 a month to some California fund is not simple.  

    Even if I wanted to use the phone, I’d have to search out for a phone to buy to plug into this.

    I was ready to sign up, but stopped when I saw the confirmation page.