<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sonic.net Internals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://corp.sonic.net/internals/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://corp.sonic.net/internals</link>
	<description>The technical internal workings of Sonic.net; a blog for System and Network Admins.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 05:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The recent DNS vulnerability and the impact on Sonic.net. by Creating Dynamic DNS through python and PowerDNS &#124; Sonoma County Code Hackers</title>
		<link>http://corp.sonic.net/internals/2008/07/11/the-recent-dns-vulnerability-and-the-impact-on-sonicnet/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Creating Dynamic DNS through python and PowerDNS &#124; Sonoma County Code Hackers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 05:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corp.sonic.net/internals/?p=9#comment-42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] reading this article on Sonic.net&#8217;s website, an interesting project came to mind&#8230; If you can back up a DNS [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading this article on Sonic.net&#8217;s website, an interesting project came to mind&#8230; If you can back up a DNS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Procmail Tips: How to forward your email. by Augie Schwer</title>
		<link>http://corp.sonic.net/internals/2008/06/24/procmail-tips-how-to-forward-your-email/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Augie Schwer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 20:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corp.sonic.net/internals/?p=5#comment-41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad to help!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Perl and RPM don’t get along. by Karthik Dathathri</title>
		<link>http://corp.sonic.net/internals/2008/08/13/when-perl-and-rpm-don%e2%80%99t-get-along/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Karthik Dathathri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corp.sonic.net/internals/?p=11#comment-40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi William,

I was also facing a similar issue and was wondering from where those files came under &quot;Requires&quot; category when they aren&#039;t mentioned in the spec file. Now, I understood the problem. Thanks for the fix as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi William,</p>
<p>I was also facing a similar issue and was wondering from where those files came under &#8220;Requires&#8221; category when they aren&#8217;t mentioned in the spec file. Now, I understood the problem. Thanks for the fix as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Areca Tools RPM for CentOS Linux. by Matto</title>
		<link>http://corp.sonic.net/internals/2008/11/14/areca-tools-rpm-for-centos-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Matto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corp.sonic.net/internals/?p=24#comment-39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Sandon, First off, thanks so much for making these tools available! I recently gave the Areca 1680ix a try, but had lots of trouble either with the disks or the SAS enclosure (it was in a SuperMicro 2u case with their 8-disk sas/sata backplane). The disks just wouldn&#039;t show up in the Areca BIOS. Because of time constraints, I ended up replacing the Areca card with a 3ware 9650, which I will probably end up regretting. 

Have you found that the Areca cards are particularly picky with disk models and firmware versions? Their cards seem a lot better than the 3wares both under heavy IO and in recovery; but the 3ware cards are a lot easier to get up and running.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sandon, First off, thanks so much for making these tools available! I recently gave the Areca 1680ix a try, but had lots of trouble either with the disks or the SAS enclosure (it was in a SuperMicro 2u case with their 8-disk sas/sata backplane). The disks just wouldn&#8217;t show up in the Areca BIOS. Because of time constraints, I ended up replacing the Areca card with a 3ware 9650, which I will probably end up regretting. </p>
<p>Have you found that the Areca cards are particularly picky with disk models and firmware versions? Their cards seem a lot better than the 3wares both under heavy IO and in recovery; but the 3ware cards are a lot easier to get up and running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Procmail Tips: How to forward your email. by Ramon</title>
		<link>http://corp.sonic.net/internals/2008/06/24/procmail-tips-how-to-forward-your-email/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corp.sonic.net/internals/?p=5#comment-38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks a lot! This saved me so much trouble. I have quite a complex set of procmail rules, and since I added gmail forwarding I&#039;ve been producing a loop or two. This fixed everything :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot! This saved me so much trouble. I have quite a complex set of procmail rules, and since I added gmail forwarding I&#8217;ve been producing a loop or two. This fixed everything <img src='http://corp.sonic.net/internals/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Perl , $SIG{CHLD} = &#8216;IGNORE&#8217; , system() and you. by Augie Schwer</title>
		<link>http://corp.sonic.net/internals/2008/06/24/perl-sigchld-ignore-system-and-you/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Augie Schwer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corp.sonic.net/internals/?p=6#comment-37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Alan, I believe the answer is reap your own zombies and save the value of $? before calling waidpid :

&lt;code&gt;
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;

use POSIX;

my $RV;

sub REAPER
{ print &quot;REAPER\n&quot;; $RV=$?; waitpid(-1 , WNOHANG); }
$SIG{CHLD} = \&amp;REAPER;
system(&#039;true&#039;);
print &quot;RV: $?\n&quot;;
print &quot;RV: $RV\n&quot;;
&lt;/code&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alan, I believe the answer is reap your own zombies and save the value of $? before calling waidpid :</p>
<p><code><br />
#!/usr/bin/perl<br />
use strict;<br />
use warnings;</p>
<p>use POSIX;</p>
<p>my $RV;</p>
<p>sub REAPER<br />
{ print "REAPER\n"; $RV=$?; waitpid(-1 , WNOHANG); }<br />
$SIG{CHLD} = \&REAPER;<br />
system('true');<br />
print "RV: $?\n";<br />
print "RV: $RV\n";<br />
</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Perl , $SIG{CHLD} = &#8216;IGNORE&#8217; , system() and you. by Alan Mah</title>
		<link>http://corp.sonic.net/internals/2008/06/24/perl-sigchld-ignore-system-and-you/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Mah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corp.sonic.net/internals/?p=6#comment-36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perl , $SIG{CHLD} = ‘IGNORE’ , system() and you.”

Since this $SIG{CHLD} = &#039;IGNORE&#039; or \&amp;REAPER puts -1 in $?, how do you determine if all the socket reads, writes and system calls are successful or not?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perl , $SIG{CHLD} = ‘IGNORE’ , system() and you.”</p>
<p>Since this $SIG{CHLD} = &#8216;IGNORE&#8217; or \&amp;REAPER puts -1 in $?, how do you determine if all the socket reads, writes and system calls are successful or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to write a WordPress plugin to notify your customers via Twitter. by Bookmarks about Write</title>
		<link>http://corp.sonic.net/internals/2008/07/03/how-to-write-a-wordpress-plugin-to-notify-your-customers-via-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corp.sonic.net/internals/?p=8#comment-35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] - bookmarked by 6 members originally found by ktcatch10 on 2008-10-30  How to write a WordPress plugin to notify your customers via Twitter.  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; bookmarked by 6 members originally found by ktcatch10 on 2008-10-30  How to write a WordPress plugin to notify your customers via Twitter.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Areca Tools RPM for CentOS Linux. by Augie Schwer</title>
		<link>http://corp.sonic.net/internals/2008/11/14/areca-tools-rpm-for-centos-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Augie Schwer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corp.sonic.net/internals/?p=24#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sandon, we are using the ARC-1220 and only have it in two boxes at the moment.

Currently one of the boxes that runs a Xen kernel is exhibiting odd behavior, seemingly random resets, that we are currently investigating; the other box seems to be doing quite well and sees a good deal of I/O.

I have not tried migrating 3ware stained drives over to an Areca controller.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandon, we are using the ARC-1220 and only have it in two boxes at the moment.</p>
<p>Currently one of the boxes that runs a Xen kernel is exhibiting odd behavior, seemingly random resets, that we are currently investigating; the other box seems to be doing quite well and sees a good deal of I/O.</p>
<p>I have not tried migrating 3ware stained drives over to an Areca controller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Areca Tools RPM for CentOS Linux. by Sandon</title>
		<link>http://corp.sonic.net/internals/2008/11/14/areca-tools-rpm-for-centos-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corp.sonic.net/internals/?p=24#comment-33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How are those areca&#039;s working out for you and which models did you get? I work as a system administrator for a large managed shared web-hosting provider in Down Town Los Angeles and we might be making the same switch very soon. I have been pushing for Areca for quite some time when I saw low performance from 3ware 9650SE-8LPML controllers. 

At first the solution was to switch from raid6 to raid10 and that didn&#039;t really help that much. We have major issues with high loads due to iowait and after testing some LSI cards I finally convinced some people to test out some areca&#039;s. We got 2 of the ARC-1222&#039;s and from my own testing they seem good but its not my decision so I am waiting to hear from my co-workers.

I use an ARC-1280ML in my home system (20x1TB raid6) and my colo&#039;d box at work has an ARC-1220 (8x750 GB raid5). I never have iowait issues on my dated ARC-1220 controller even when seeding a bunch of linux distro ISOs which is about as IO/heavy as things can get. All the machines are 2U super-micro systems with the 8x hot-swap bays. The slightly older systems are using 8x750 GB seagate ES.2 drives and the newer ones are using the 1TB AS series (going with AS was not a good choice IMHO).

3ware has been really kick our asses not just because of performance but so far we already lost about 1% of 3TB of data due to an fsck being ran when one of the drives was messed up (getting bad sectors and what not) but the stupid 3ware controller didn&#039;t kick it out of the array. Another system got some error with the onboard cache sync and after rebooting the array was just gone. With a livecd and tw_cli it complained about the DCB being corrupt or something which I believe is the disk configuration block which has all the raid info in and is completely unrecoverable from on the 3ware controllers. On an areca you could re-create the array (assuming you knew the settings) and chose noinit and recover from that.

Anyway these 3wares have been leaving a bad taste in my mouth and I was curious of the experience of someone else who has used areca controllers in a large amount of machines. Have any problems with DOA or controllers dieing with the arecas?

Also I assumed it wasn&#039;t possible but I was curious if you have tried using drives from a 3ware controller and been able to use the array on an Areca?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are those areca&#8217;s working out for you and which models did you get? I work as a system administrator for a large managed shared web-hosting provider in Down Town Los Angeles and we might be making the same switch very soon. I have been pushing for Areca for quite some time when I saw low performance from 3ware 9650SE-8LPML controllers. </p>
<p>At first the solution was to switch from raid6 to raid10 and that didn&#8217;t really help that much. We have major issues with high loads due to iowait and after testing some LSI cards I finally convinced some people to test out some areca&#8217;s. We got 2 of the ARC-1222&#8242;s and from my own testing they seem good but its not my decision so I am waiting to hear from my co-workers.</p>
<p>I use an ARC-1280ML in my home system (20x1TB raid6) and my colo&#8217;d box at work has an ARC-1220 (8&#215;750 GB raid5). I never have iowait issues on my dated ARC-1220 controller even when seeding a bunch of linux distro ISOs which is about as IO/heavy as things can get. All the machines are 2U super-micro systems with the 8x hot-swap bays. The slightly older systems are using 8&#215;750 GB seagate ES.2 drives and the newer ones are using the 1TB AS series (going with AS was not a good choice IMHO).</p>
<p>3ware has been really kick our asses not just because of performance but so far we already lost about 1% of 3TB of data due to an fsck being ran when one of the drives was messed up (getting bad sectors and what not) but the stupid 3ware controller didn&#8217;t kick it out of the array. Another system got some error with the onboard cache sync and after rebooting the array was just gone. With a livecd and tw_cli it complained about the DCB being corrupt or something which I believe is the disk configuration block which has all the raid info in and is completely unrecoverable from on the 3ware controllers. On an areca you could re-create the array (assuming you knew the settings) and chose noinit and recover from that.</p>
<p>Anyway these 3wares have been leaving a bad taste in my mouth and I was curious of the experience of someone else who has used areca controllers in a large amount of machines. Have any problems with DOA or controllers dieing with the arecas?</p>
<p>Also I assumed it wasn&#8217;t possible but I was curious if you have tried using drives from a 3ware controller and been able to use the array on an Areca?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
